Brief The Implications of a Supreme Court Finding for the Plaintiff in King vs. Burwell: 8.2 Million More Uninsured and 35% Higher Premiums
Linda J. Blumberg, Matthew Buettgens, John Holahan
Display Date
File
File
Download Report
(480.32 KB)

The Supreme Court will hear the King v. Burwell case, in which the plaintiff argues that the ACA prohibits payment of premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions to people in states without state-managed Marketplaces. We estimate that a victory for the plaintiff would increase the number of uninsured by 8.2 million people and eliminate $28.8 billion in tax credits and cost-sharing reductions in 2016 ($340 billion over 10 years) for 9.3 million people. With lower-cost individuals leaving the market, average nongroup premiums in 34 states would increase by 35 percent, affecting those purchasing inside and outside those Marketplaces.

Click here for more research on the King v. Burwell case

Research Areas Health and health care
Tags Health insurance Federal health care reform State health care reform Private insurance
Policy Centers Health Policy Center